Genetic conflict,
condition dependence and sexual dimorphism
Chief Investigators: Russell Bonduriansky |
A sexual
tug-of-war
When traits have different functions in
females and males (e.g., sexual
functions in one sex only), a gene may
be beneficial when expressed in one sex,
but deleterious when expressed in the
other sex. This form of intragenomic
conflict, known as ‘intralocus sexual
conflict’, may be pervasive in sexually
reproducing species, including humans,
and drives the evolution of phenotypic
differences between the sexes (sexual
dimorphism). We are investigating the
causes of this conflict, and its
consequences at the genetic and
phenotypic level. We employ a
combination of quantitative genetics,
experiments that manipulate
environmental parameters such as diet,
and development of new theory to address
this important evolutionary puzzle.
|
|
Genetic conflict and the evolution of sexual dimorphism
In many animal species, the sexes differ
strikingly in body size and shape,
apparently as a result of sexual
selection on males. We ask how and why
such sexual dimorphism evolves, through
lab and field research on flies and
other insects.
In the giant long-legged fly Telostylinus
angusticollis, males use their
greatly elongated legs, heads and
antennae to as weapons. T. lineolatus,
which is native to tropical
north-Queensland, is much less sexually
dimorphic. We are interested in the
genetic and phenotypic basis of
variation in body size and shape in
these species. Further information on
our research can be found here. |
 |
| |
T.
angusticollis flies
mating at sunset in the Fred Hollows
Reserve, Sydney (Photo: R.
Bonduriansky). |
|
We are
investigating the genetic basis of
within-sex variation and sexual
dimorphism in body size and shape. Since
the sex-determination system of these
flies is unknown, we are also
investigating their karyotype
(chromosome complement) to determine
whether they exhibit an XX/XY, ZZ/ZW or
some other form of sex determination. |
 |
| |
Diploid
mitotic chromosomes of T.
angusticollis. |
|
In the
carrion fly Prochyliza xanthostoma, we found
that males with longer heads are more
attractive to females, and transfer more
sperm, but fare poorly in combat with
rival males. We also found that traits
under sexual selection in males tend to
be more strongly heritable through the
father, a possible genomic adaptation to
intralocus sexual conflict. Further
information can be found here. |
 |
 |
| |
A mating
pair of Prochyliza xanthostoma,
(Photo: R. Bonduriansky). |
P.
xanthostoma males fighting (Photo:
R. Bonduriansky). |
|
The role of
environment: condition dependence and
parental effects
Although genes are extremely important,
it is becoming increasingly clear that
environmental effects can have a
powerful influence on many traits.
Phenotypic variation in response to an
environmental gradient, known as
‘phenotypic plasticity’, can be a
crucial aspect of adaptation. A special
form of phenotypic plasticity called
‘condition dependence’ – the response of
a phenotypic trait to variation in
individual condition – is thought to
play an important role in the evolution
and expression of sexually selected
traits. Moreover, recent findings
suggest that many environmental effects
can be transferred across generations.
Experiments on the neriid fly Telostylinus angusticollis have
shown that body size and shape are
extremely sensitive to environment and,
especially, larval diet. Such ‘condition
dependence’ is thought to play a key
role in the evolution of sexually
selected traits. Moreover, we have
recently discovered that males transfer
their condition to their offspring. We
would like to understand the proximate
basis and evolutionary implications of
this effect. Further information on our
research can be found here. |
Brothers
reared on contrasting larval diets: the
male on the right is larger, has
relatively larger secondary sexual
traits, and would produce larger
offspring (Photo: R. Bonduriansky). |
|
As part of our investigation of the
transfer of maternal and paternal
condition to offspring, we are
investigating the reproductive
physiology of T. angusticollis and T. lineolatus.
|
Reproductive
physiology of T. angusticolllis: a, male testes (T) and accessory
glands (AG), b, female bursa
copulatrix (BC), three spermathecae (S)
and oviduct (O), c, sclerotized
oviscape of female (Ov). |
|
Further reading
Bonduriansky, R. 2006.
Convergent evolution of sexual shape dimorphism
in Diptera. Journal of Morphology 267:
602-611.
Bonduriansky, R. and Rowe,
L. 2003. Interactions among mechanisms of sexual
selection on male body size and head shape in a
sexually dimorphic fly. Evolution 57:
2046-2053.
Day, T. and
Bonduriansky, R. 2004. Intralocus sexual
conflict can drive the evolution of genomic
imprinting. Genetics 167:
1537-1546.
Bonduriansky, R. and Rowe, L.
2005. Intralocus sexual conflict and the genetic
architecture of sexually dimorphic traits in Prochyliza xanthostoma (Diptera:
Piophilidae). Evolution 59: 1965-1975.
Bonduriansky, R and Head, M.
2007. Effects of maternal and paternal condition
on offspring in Telostylinus angusticollis (Diptera: Neriidae). Journal of Evolutionary
Biology (in press).
Bonduriansky 2007. The
evolution of condition dependent sexual
dimorphism. American Naturalist 169:
9-19. |